I saw the UN cover up sexual abuse

May 2, 2015

The United Nations denies it tried to cover up the sexual abuse of minors by French troops in the Central African Republic.  The world body calls the allegations “highly offensive.” I can testify from my own personal experience in the Democratic Republic of Congo that the UN does hide the abuse of its blue helmets and others.

While in the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2003, I reported to UN authorities a number of occasions of suspected and confirmed abuse and was told by both UN officials and the finance officer of the NGO I worked for to “shut up.”  Two years later, once the allegations were made public in the press, I was called from the UN headquarters in New York and asked about what I knew.

The abuses I saw or that were reported to me by the Congolese go from Uruguayan troops in Kindu having sex with children, both boys and girls, to Moroccan troops filming trained dogs having sex with Congolese women in Kisangani.  I saw a UN tug in Kissangani being used as a whore house with Moroccan soldiers lined up outside.

I reported to the UN authorities a case of mass rape by local militia within view of UN troops in Kindu who did not budge to assist the women.  I learned that the UN is very good at turning a blind eye to abuse in order to protect its image as long as the information does not get out.

I also reported that Interahamwe, Rwandan Hutu rebels, who had surrendered to UN preacekeepers in the DRC disarmament program, and then handed over to the Congolese army in Lumumbashi ‘for safe-keeping’, were being abused and tortured before being returned to Rwanda by the UN for “re-education and reinsertion.”.  This information was given directly to me by the UN doctor in Kananga who examined them before the flight to Kigali.  She too had reported it to the UN.  The doctor told me women family members of the Hutu rebels were also sexually abused by the Congolese soldiers while in detention.  Nothing was done, said or leaked for two years.

In 2005 UN Human Rights Chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein published what is referred to as the Zeid Report on sexual abuse in peacekeeping operations.  It is supposed to be the definitive report.  The UN promised to clean up its act.

The reaction to the leak in the Central African Republic was for the UN to suspend a high-ranking official suspected of informing the press of yet another cover-up.  Some habits die hard and UN hypocrisy and lying remains intact.  Once again the whistle-blower is punished when it is the UN who has the explaining to do.

My experience with the UN is that many of their highly paid bureaucrats, very often political appointees promoted by their home governments, do not want any noise or waves.  It discusts me that the Swede, Anders Kompass, may lose his job for being one of the few who is willing to step forward to see abuse stopped when the UN won’t do it itself.

Is disliking Islam a form of racism?

April 27, 2015

The debate in France this week centers on Islamophobia and is sparked by the publishing of two books. The first by Charb (1), one of the artists killed in the January 7 Charlie Hebdo attack and the second by a Journalist, Caroline Fourest(2).

Both reject attempts to stifle debate on Islam by labeling any who criticize the religion of Mohammed as “Islamophobes.” They write that in reality, the crusade against Islamaphobia is an attempt to weaken secularism; to put religion above the laws of the land.

Those who fight Islamaphobia,” writes Charb, “in reality, are not doing it to defend Muslims as individuals, but rather to defend the religion.”

Caroline Fourest believes the term itself “is not only slippery but dangerous: it aims to put targets on the foreheads of the defenders of secularism.”

’Hate speech’ is the modern term for heresy,” writes the Somali exiled author, Ayaan Hirsi Ali(3). “And in the present atmosphere, anything that makes Muslims feel uncomfortable is branded as ‘hate.’”

Of course, what is being done to “defend” Muslims against criticism is what pro-Israelis have been doing for years. Those who denounce Israel as an Apartheid regime; who denounce the inhuman and illegal blockade of Gaza; who decry the whole Zionist project (even fellow Jews like Noam Chomsky and Shlomo Sand); or those who merely call for a two state solution along the 1967 borders, are immediately branded “anti-Semites.”

In France today, criticizing a religion is more and more often equated with racism and the expression of racism in France is illegal, punishable by prison and hefty fines. The real questions should be: Why can’t we criticize religion?

Oh, the poor atheists who are everybody’s racists.

I’m a New Testament sort of guy although I am the first to admit the worst tragedies were committed in the name of Jesus, a man who preached love, non-violence and tolerance.

Why should I not be able to call the Old Testament a horrible place where genocide, murder, rape, slavery, aggression, looting, theft of land and goods and destruction are all justified. And when I look at how Tsahal, the Israeli Army, conducts itself, I can only believe that that collection of anctient tales is their Army Field Manual. Under French law, the Old Testament should be banned for apology of genocide, apology of murder and complicity in terrorism not to mention racial discrimination, all of which are illegal and punishable by prison and fines.  The Chosen People indeed!

Ah, but no Jew is going to kill me or blow up a school because I say such things.  However, there is a religion which does have many such people.  And they want to silence me.

Why should I not be able to echo the Somali exile, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who points out time and time again that “Islam is not a religion of peace.” Under French law the Qur’an and the Hadith should be banned because it calls for murder for such things as Apostasy or having an extra-marital affair. It justifies slavery and discriminates against women. It puts Sharia religious law above that of the land and may help explain why there are some ten thousand Polygamous families in France according to government estimates.

It is foolish to insist,” writes Ayaan Hirsi Ali, “as our leaders habitually do, that the violent acts of radical Islamists can be divorced from the religious ideals that inspire them.

The irony is Hirsi Ali’s book will probably never be published in France because it will be banned as “inciting to racial and religious hatred.”

Another question is whether it is Islamophobia to complain that those Muslims enjoying the freedom of our Western democracies and cultures are not doing much to denounce the atrocities being committed in the name of their religion. Let me re-phrase that: They are doing nothing!

And since when is denouncing a religion denouncing a race? (Full disclosure: I do not believe, as the Nazis did and the Zionists do, that Jews are a race)  Islam is not a race. Does saying such things make me a racist? Does the fact an atheist may hate all religions and be obsessed with exposing them for ‘frauds’ make him guilty of “hate speech?”

It is also ironic that the war on terrorism should have as one of its first casualties, the freedom of speech and thought of not liking a religion in particular or all religions in general.  This is a direct challenge to the Enlightenment of the XVIIth century.

And when it comes to religions, some in France are even fighting over which form of “anti-religious racism” is worse than the other. The Jews are winning. The Mister-Anti-Racism of the French government, Gilles Clavreul, told the daily Libération(4) “All racism is condemnable, but the anti-Arab and Anti-Black racism has not the same resiliency in its violence as anti-Semitism.”

“’Scandal!” says the leader of the French Anti-Islamophobia Movement, Marwan Mohammed. He told Libération that he regrets the government is “attempting to put a hierarchy and categories to racism.”

Professor of Sociology, Abdellali Hajjat, co-author of Islamophobia with Marwan Mohammad, told the same newspaper that the French government “seems to favor the fight against anti-Semitism to the detriment of the fight against Islamophobia.”

And this is where the wave breaks. You can denounce Judaism without hating people because they are Jewish; that is without being anti-Semite although nobody is denouncing Judaism. Maybe because they leave others alone. But apparently, you cannot criticize Islam without being … what exactly? One should think that, after Charlie Hebdo, the debate should be going in the other direction.

 

  1. Charb, Lettre aux escrocs de l’islamophobie qui font le jeu des racists (A Letter to the Crooks of Islamophobia who play into the Hands of Racists), Paris, 2015.
  2. Caroline Fourest, Eloge du blaspheme (An Eloge to Blasphemy), Paris, 2015.
  3. Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Heretic, Why Islam Needs a Reformation Now, New York, 2015.
  4. Gilles Clavreul, Libération, April 17, 2015. His title is Inter-Ministerial Delegate Against Racism and Anti-Semitism.
  5. Marwan Muhammad, Spokesman for the Collective Against Islamophobia in France, CCIF. His book is Islamophobia, Maspéro, Paris, 2013.

Babying the Butchers

April 18, 2015

France wants to cajole its radical muslim youth, offer them special high school and technical education in free housing centers with case workers constantly at their sides as Denmark is trying to do.  In a country with over five million unemployed, a growing poverty rate and an income tax burden which weighs very heavily on the middle class, this is fodder for the National Front canons.

Under French law, those youth who plan to go to Syria are accomplices to Crimes against Humanity and the more than 200 estimated to have returned are guilty of Crimes against Humanity.  Getting special perks for supporting or participating in ISIS horrors will raise eyebrows.  French law also says apology for terrorism, that is vocally supporting violent groups and/or their actions, can get you up to seven years in prison.

Of the estimated 6000 European Muslims who have gone to join the “Holy War” in Syria, according to European Justice Minister Vera Jourova, nearly 1,500 are French.  Over the past year more than 3,000 Muslims in France have been reported to the police for their Jihadist views and frighteningly, 40% of them are female. Farhad Khosrokhavar, of the School of Higher Studies in Social Sciences (EHESS) says women make up “about 20% of the people who left Europe for Syria.”

France long disregarded its Muslim population under the pretext the state is secular.  Because France does not recognize minorities, their is no ethnic census and Paris cannot even say how many Muslims there are in the country.  The official number has been over five million for 25 years.  Given the demographics of the immigrant and French Muslim population, it is quite possible the figure is twice as high.

Stoking the flames of anti-Muslim sentiment after the January terrorist attacks in Paris, the far right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen claimed there are between 15 and 20 million Muslims in France. A figure the pro-government Nouvel Observateur called “fantasiste” based on a study where people volunteered to name their religious affiliation.  The National Front can make these claims because the truth is, the authorities just don’t know.

The only place where the French have been able to truly monitor the number of extremist Muslims is in the prisons which are considered a primary breeding ground for Jihadist recruitment.  While officially six percent of the French people is Muslim, they make up from 60 to 70% of the prison population.  This figure has further stigmatized Muslims as a criminal class which the extreme right wing has been feeding on for years for its propaganda.

After an experiment in the Fresnes prison outside Paris, the Minister of Justice, Christiane Tubira, decided she would create five prison centers dedicated to hold radical Jihadists.  The official reason can be interpreted to mean cajole them:  they will be in groups of ten to fifteen “to allow an individual and adequate caring for them,” said the socialist Jean-Pierre Sueur, a member of a special Senate Committee on Radical Islam.

But they may be too late. The sociologist Farhad Khosrokhavar told the French daily Le Monde that the Jihadists in prison have adopted to French surveillance by “dissimulating their faith…They have shaved their beards, not because they have renounced their Islamist credo, but to become invisible to the penitentiary authorities.”

The French government plans on hiring 60 Muslim chaplains to preach “moderate Islam.”  Ouisa Kies, a sociolgist in charge of detecting radical Islamic prisoners told Le Monde that this is a good idea because although Islam is “the number one religion in prison, there are only 182 Muslim chaplains as compared to 700 Catholics.”

One pilot program (1) set up to re-educate radical muslims even uses what they call “quietist” (non-violent) Salafists as mediators which sounds to me much like when Jordan released Al Qaeda prisoners in January, hoping they would drain recruits from ISIS.  After all, a Salafist believes in Sharia law and the strict application of the Koran which stipulates the death penalty for such crimes as apostasy, certainly contrary to not only the “values” of the French Republic, but to its laws above all.

To complicate matters, according to Le Monde (2), Jihadist support is no longer limited to what can be called ‘the brainless losers from the Banlieus who flunked out of school before they could read and write properly,’ or what policitally correct social workers refer to as ‘clients.’ “ It is now reaching the middle and even superior classes.  It affects younger and younger adolescents (15-16 years-old), students, graduates, sometimes whole families.”

This makes it harder for the bien-pensants to explain the Islamic terror appeal to Muslim youth as merely a reaction against their social and economic marginalization.  It underlines that in France there is a problem with how many Muslims relate to the country and its democracy.  In different ways, they will be at the center of the 2017 election debate and especially with the old argument that they come to France to profit from its generous entitlement system.

It is clear who is being pointed at when former president Nicolas Sarkozy denounces “the assisted.”  He has changed his tune from “national identity” to “the Republic” but the message is the same.  “Importing the assisted (read immigrant welfare recipients) is frankly a provocation…by the civil service and by those supported by the French welfare (l’assistanat) system.” (3)  This is not new.  In the 2007 election campaign Sarkozy complained “today those who work earn less than those on welfare (les assistés).”

Sarkozy’s words might be carefully chosen but everybody can read his lips: les assistés importés are of course Muslims, Arabs, Africans, Immigrants.  And there is no way to know for sure how heavily they weigh on the welfare system because there is no ethnic census.

While the lines are being drawn in the sand for what will be the election debate in 2017, the Muslim community is busy … doing nothing.  Yet, they are best placed to fight the radicalization taking hold of their youth.  If they continue to be passive, then they will only reinforce the opinion that Islam has no place in La République and the political debate will be about who can stigmatize them most to get the most votes.

1.Maison de la prévention et de la familles, set up in the Fall of 2014 by jurist and psychologist Sonia Imloul.

2. Culture & Idées, 8 April 2015.

3. Interview with Le Journal du Dimanche, 12 April 2015.

France’s war on terrorism and collateral damage

January 15, 2015

The man who got on a Parisian bus with me Wednesday was an Arab who had not shaven in four days. He had dark olive skin and kinky black hair and was visibly unbalanced: drugs? He sang to a popular tune “I’m going on Jihad. Won’t you come on Jihad with me too?” He risks five years in prison and a 75 thousand euro fine.

In the first six days after the massacre at Charlie Hebdo, 54 people were charged with “apology for terrorism” under a tough law voted in the French parliament last November which can jail someone, if they express their “support for terrorism” on the electronic media: FaceBook, Twitter etc., to up to seven years and fine them 100 thousand euros .

France’s “war on terrorism” has begun. The new law allows the “apologists” to be brought before a judge as soon as they are arrested in a process called “comparution immediate”; that is without time to prepare a defense.  It is a law for a time of war. Read the rest of this entry »

Charlie and the Banlieues

January 12, 2015

They came in their hundreds of thousands. Jews, Muslims (although fewer than hoped for), Christians and atheists: Students, workers, the unemployed and the bourgeoisie. They said “I am Charlie.” “I am Ahmed.” (the policeman executed at Charlie Hebdo). “I am a Jew.” Or, they just said nothing.

They were anarchists, communists and ultra nationalists, social democrats and conservatives. There were also islamophobes and anti-Semites. The one thing that united them all was their refusal to yield to fear and their desire to keep the freedom to think what they want and to be able to say it in public without facing obscurantist violence. This coming together of those who want the right to disagree with each is extraordinary. France, which gave us the enlightenment, 1789 and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is still Une Grande Nation.

Read the rest of this entry »

Je suis charlie

January 8, 2015

Last night I was at Place de la République with many hundreds of others to express our anger at what THEY did to Charlie Hebdo. It was the only place to be.

Unfortunately, there were no Muslims at the protest. Sure, there were Muslim journalists there, but they were there as reporters, not Muslims. I saw only two older women with head-scarves obviously there to say they disagree with the Jihadist murderers. And as they were the only two, the cameras were all over them, which could give the impression Muslims were present.

When the US and Britain invaded Iraq, millions of people took to the streets and chanted “Not in my name!” Muslims in France have to do this now or the anger of ethnic French will be justified. Silence, under the present circumstances, is complicity.

However, there was a group there with banner and flags in a totally unacceptable attempt to take advantage of the hideous killings.  The Union of Jewish Students in France, a pro-Israeli Lobby, complete with their star of David, was a sick attempt to give the killings a different color.  What happened on January 7 has nothing to do with Palestinians’ struggle against the murderous apartheid regime Israel has imposed on the occupied territories.

Lanzarote : an island sinking under the weight of its success

March 25, 2013

The tourist guide got off the bus and greeted the group of chubby British women with “Shopping in Playa Blanca ? Shopping in Playa Blanca?” He could have said “doggy wanna bone?” and it would have been the same. I knew I had to see this.

Playa Blanca, a sprawling resort on the southern coast of Lanzarote, is everything native born artist César Manrique did not want for his waterless, volcanic island. Thanks to Manrique, the farthest east and the most arid of the Canary Islands escaped the mega hotels which defaced La Palma, Tenerife and Gran Canaria. Read the rest of this entry »

Crossing the Vietnamese-Cambodian border

July 17, 2012

Visas just seem to be a money making scheme for the Cambodians while for the Vietnamese it is an exercise in sadism. Read the rest of this entry »

The Hmong and the Vietnamese : Mésentente not so Cordiale

July 13, 2012

The Hmong are a fiercely independent people who see Vietnamese profiteers moving in on their land as a threat.  But the biggest threat to their way of life is probably tourism. Read the rest of this entry »

Vietnam – The Phoenix, the Turtle, the Dragon and the Unicorn

June 29, 2012

In which the Vietnamese try to destroy my prejudice and I search for the war that, as a young soldier, I could not support. Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 50 other followers